WordPress or MovableType
I answered the question "What choose MT or WP?" , And thought that it must be told to share may prove useful to anyone who has any experience so no other. This is not a recommendation, and in the end not written, what better engine. But this set of distinctive elements that can affect something.
Start with what must have: a lot of choice depends on what tasks you will be dealt with. For hunched not say that one is better, the other worse.
MovableType preferable when it may be necessary to create more than one blog (MT supports multiblog), and if the development process will people not familiar with PHP. Also in MovableType can be static pages of the publication. This reduces the burden on the host and may increase browsing plates "Rebuilding, for example, entry 2 of 2000."
WordPress trapped under one blog templates are based on PHP, and the page is always dynamically generated.
Selecting design templates ready for WordPress enormous.
Panel MovableType somewhat stricter than WordPress. Pro functionality can not answer definitely, but in terms of management of users (separation ability to add articles / publications / editing) WordPress provides a natural system.
The common view today is about: WordPress is the ideal solution for a private blog, in its own hosting. Flexible, easy and convenient. MovableType rather good tool for corporate blogging, both domestic and public.
Incidentally, the MT much more laborious process than WP installation. While hardcore blogger nor any of the other is difficult, but must think about ordinary people, blogs are generally to simplify publishing opportunities come.
Incidentally, MT, in most cases, use-selling product. It also may be influencing factor.
In case of uncertainty in the choice of engine, we recommend using the test to both, and deal with the same tasks in parallel. One cause inconvenience or difficulty before the second. This all and decide.
Transleted from mazoo.net
